Re: building slrn on sparc
Clint Adams <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > You wish to impose your idea of the best default on everyone
> > else though.
> Yes, just as you/Ben/Matthias want to impose your idea of the best
> default on everyone else.
> > The behavior you want is possible, you just need to configure the
> > system properly. It's like configuring the mailer, or some other
> > service on the machine, tweaking it to your particular taste. This
> > is no different.
> One difference is that this behavior is the opposite of upstream's
> (gcc's), the opposite of woody's, and different from every other
> architecture in Debian. It surprises, confuses, and annoys people,
> for questionable benefit.
Why don't you just remove libc6-sparc64-dev and not worry about it?