Re: building slrn on sparc
On 14 Feb 2004 15:16:40 -0500
James Morrison <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I think we should throw away the gcc wrapper. Currently gcc-3.3 defaults
> to the 32 bit arch then switches to 64 bit arch only when -m64 is provided.
> This is probably what most people expect so I think the gcc wrapper should
> be thrown away.
Absolutely not, I vehemently disagree.
When uname returns sparc64, gcc should produce 64-bit executables by default.
It is the only set of sane semantics for GCC bootstraps for example.