Re: building slrn on sparc
Norbert Tretkowski <email@example.com> writes:
> * James Morrison wrote:
> > Norbert Tretkowski <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > I know this package builds perfectly on the sparc build daemon,
> > > and on all other architectures (that's why it's in testing
> > > already), but I have no idea why it fails on my machine (up to
> > > date sid).
> > Does it work if you link against openssl instead of gnutls-extras?
> That was the right point, thanks! I haven't tried it with libssl-dev,
> but with libgnutls7-dev instead of libgnutls10-dev, and it did work.
> Is gnutls10 broken on sparc? Or did I make a mistake?
I think this is our gcc wrapper coming up to bite someone else. Please do
sparc32 /bin/bash then try building.
I think we should throw away the gcc wrapper. Currently gcc-3.3 defaults
to the 32 bit arch then switches to 64 bit arch only when -m64 is provided.
This is probably what most people expect so I think the gcc wrapper should
be thrown away.