Re: building slrn on sparc
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:45:20 -0500
Clint Adams <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Absolutely not, I vehemently disagree.
> > When uname returns sparc64, gcc should produce 64-bit executables by default.
> > It is the only set of sane semantics for GCC bootstraps for example.
> That would be much more reasonable if uname returned 'sparc' by default.
It's not a 'sparc' system, it's a sparc64 one.
If _you_ want 'sparc' by default, you can do this by running "sparc32 bash"
or whatever shell you use, in that session uname will return 'sparc'.