Re: simple batch queue system?
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 11:12:16AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have missed the reason why the expiration of clauses 1 and 2 could have been
> cancelled a posteriori.
Because the OpenPBS copyright holder decided to go commercial and push
their OpenPBS-Enhanced or whatever product. Note that it is really
difficult to find their license, but the last time I discussed this with
Morten (when I noticed that torque is in Ubuntu universe), I found the
license on their site without the expiration clause).
However, I agree that it would be OK to assume they cannot retract that
from the fork that Torque did. So if people think that the rest if fine
(as I said, there are varying opinions, but certainly some people think
it is fine), it could go into main.
Michael
Reply to: