Am Montag, den 27.10.2008, 22:13 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: > I have been thinking a bit further about the bibtex references, and wonder > about two questions: > > - What kind of unique identifier will we give to them? I used the scheme "First Author, Year, Colon, Software" for quite some time now. Example: "Baker2001:apbs" for APBS [0]. Until now, I did not have any problems with that. > - Downloadable references often include the abstract, but the abstract is > copyrighted work most of the time. Should we better not include them? I think we should leave it out. If some meta-information like DOI or PMID is given, it's trivial to get the abstract. Also, the abstract is not needed when citing; I expect people to have read the paper when doing so, so they already have (read) the abstract. Best regards Manuel [0] http://apbs.sourceforge.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil