Re: Request for freeze exception for maxima
At Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:13:40 +0100,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> * David Bremner [Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:25:12 -0300]:
>
> > Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> > >Ok; gcl -42 has not migrated to testing yet, but once it does, we can
> > >scheudle binNMUs of maxima -3.1 in testing.
>
> > gcl 2.6.7-42 currently has one RC bug (#494153) filed by me. My view
> > is that this bug should be fixed before binNMUing maxima (otherwise I
> Ok, please write back when necessary, I'm stopping tracking this until I
> hear back from you.
Camm and I would like to request a binNMU for maxima to clear some
problems introduced by the older version of gcl.
The details are
maxima_5.13.0-3.1, recompile with gcl 2.6.7-44, 1, alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
That is, all archs but armel (where Camm tells me it won't help) and
m68k, where gcl is Not-For-Us.
This should fix #489871, and other brokenness related to randomized sbreak,
which became default (I think) in kernel 2.6.25-something
Reply to: