Re: Request for freeze exception for maxima
* David Bremner [Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:13:04 -0300]:
(Overriding M-F-T: -devel, I'd like this to be tracked on -release.)
> > This means, however, that maxima is left with RC bugs in testing that
> > can't be fixed via unstable (hooray!, Camm). [Unless that the newer GCL
> > available now has magically made them disappear, do you know if that's
> > the case or not?]
> maxima would minimally need to be rebuilt (binNMU ?). I am currently
> tracking down some strange interaction with randomized sbrk and
> pbuilder on my box (that are the same for both 5.15.0-2 and
> 5.13.0-3.1, and don't seem to be a problem on the buildds), but if I
> disable randomized sbrk, then 5.13.0-3.1 seems to build and pass its
> self tests with gcl-2.6.7-42. If this build problem really is just
> me, then rebuilding the version currently in testing with a current
> gcl could be an option.
> I suggest followups to debian-devel until we have something concrete
> to propose to the release team.
Ok; gcl -42 has not migrated to testing yet, but once it does, we can
scheudle binNMUs of maxima -3.1 in testing.
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Love in your heart wasn't put there to stay.
Love isn't love 'til you give it away.
-- Oscar Hammerstein II