Re: RFC: proposal for libpng (was: please unblock libpng 1.2.15~beta5-0)
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I write down what I think we should do, and how this handles our issues.
> This is explicitly a request for comments, and I want to wait at least
> until either Steve and Joss have both agreed to it, or 24 hours has
> passed, whatever is earlier.
> So, what needs to be done:
> 1. Adding back png_read_destroy and png_write_destroy which were
> accidentially removed between 1.2.13-4 and 1.2.15~beta5-0.
> 2. Conflict with the following packages (from sarge):
> libtk-img (<= 1.3-13)
Missing an epoch, and I'm not sure why you want a versioned conflict with
this one when the unstable version still has the same problem as the version
in sarge.
> mzscheme (<= 209-5)
> pngcrush (<= 1.5.10-2)
> pngmeta (<= 1.11-3)
> qemacs (<= 0.3.1-5)
> povray-3.5 (<= 3.5.0c-10)
> 3. Reducing the shlibbump to 1.2.13-4.
> 4. No other changes!
Otherwise looks ok to me.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: