Re: RFC: proposal for libpng (was: please unblock libpng 1.2.15~beta5-0)
* Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) [061219 12:07]:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I write down what I think we should do, and how this handles our issues.
> > This is explicitly a request for comments, and I want to wait at least
> > until either Steve and Joss have both agreed to it, or 24 hours has
> > passed, whatever is earlier.
>
> > So, what needs to be done:
>
> > 1. Adding back png_read_destroy and png_write_destroy which were
> > accidentially removed between 1.2.13-4 and 1.2.15~beta5-0.
>
> > 2. Conflict with the following packages (from sarge):
> > libtk-img (<= 1.3-13)
>
> Missing an epoch, and I'm not sure why you want a versioned conflict with
> this one when the unstable version still has the same problem as the version
> in sarge.
Because we "know" the unstable version doesn't fall to bad with the
versio in testing - but who has tested the stable version? The
underlaying policy is that one conflict to much is less worse than to
break stuff.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: