Re: Formal declaration of weak package ownership in source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)
Scott Kitterman writes ("Re: Formal declaration of weak package ownership in source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)"):
> These changes will require, at the very least, policy changes. We
> have a process for that.
>
> Unless this thing is somehow opt-in only, be prepared for a GR overriding it.
It might be best to do it via a GR anyway.
> P. S. In case you wonder how maintainerless works, go look at the dusty corners of the Ubuntu archive.
I'm not in favour of abolishing amintainership.
You don't explicitly say so but I get the impression from your mail
that you think what I am suggesting is a bad idea. I've read your
other messages in this thread and they have significantly influenced
my thinking. So perhaps I have misunderstood you.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: