Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk> (25/06/2009): > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:46:50PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: > > I didn't think that using the templates was required for AMs, merely > > a useful tool. I think AMs should be able to check to their > > satisfaction in other ways as appropriate, as long as it produces a > > similar result > > In theory. In practice that wasn't the impression that was given; the > impression that was given was that they really really should be used. > Even if I had carried on it was uncomfortable knowing that there > presence or absence of the templates varied. Indeed. Frontdesk says (through the welcome-new-AM mail): | Please note that philosophy and procedures questions are very | important. If you don't ask enough of them, the DAM cannot make a | proper decision which will cause great delay for the applicant. Also, | good proof should be included in the final report that the applicant | has the technical and social skills to become a Debian developer and | be part of a team of 1000. Please also include mails you exchange | with your applicant about their packages. | | Joerg Jaspert has written very good P&P (Philosophy/Procedures) and | T&S (Tasks/Skills) templates. While it's not strictly a requirement, | it's recommended that you use them or base yours on them. You can get | them from [4]. | | [4] | svn://svn.debian.org/svn/nm/trunk/nm-templates Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature