Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
On 2007-11-30, Michael Banck <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote:
>> > I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds,
>> > but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly
>> > inactive backup buildd who could quickly be made active in case the
>> > primary buildd fails.
>> I'd add ???having a responsive buildd maintainer???, uploading packages in a
>> timely fashion.
> Awww, just when we were able to keep it constructive for a couple of
This is constructive. I can only speak for the security buildd network, but
redundancy in the buildd admins increases the responsiveness in which problems
are fixed by a great deal and is highly important.