On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote: > I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds, > but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly > inactive backup buildd who could quickly be made active in case the > primary buildd fails. I'd add “having a responsive buildd maintainer”, uploading packages in a timely fashion. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
pgpI4GdlqTHwQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature