[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote:
> I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds,
> but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly
> inactive backup buildd who could quickly be made active in case the
> primary buildd fails.

I'd add “having a responsive buildd maintainer”, uploading packages in a
timely fashion.


Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: pgptXy5jofW_k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: