Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote:
> > I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds,
> > but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly
> > inactive backup buildd who could quickly be made active in case the
> > primary buildd fails.
> I'd add ???having a responsive buildd maintainer???, uploading packages in a
> timely fashion.
Awww, just when we were able to keep it constructive for a couple of