Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:25:36 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071130132536.GA13543@scowler.net>
Mail-followup-to: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>, debian-project@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071130013852.GR6471@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
References: <[🔎] 200711280832.56864.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 20071129113637.GB12774@zomers.be> <[🔎] 200711291318.39119.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 20071129145458.GA25150@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 20071129232334.GB4625@evy.nomadix.com> <[🔎] 20071130013852.GR6471@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:38:52AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Awww, just when we were able to keep it constructive for a couple of
> messages...

Redefining "redundancy" is constructive?

Reply to:

References:
- No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
  - From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
- Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
- Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
  - From: Cyril Brulebois <cyril.brulebois@enst-bretagne.fr>
- Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
Next by Date: Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
Previous by thread: Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
Next by thread: Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread