On Thursday 29 November 2007, Luk Claes wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:32:40AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html lists that alpha, mips > > and mipsel a having buildd redundancy, but that does not seem to match > > reality as both only have a single buildd (alpha: goetz; mips: ball; > > mipsel: rem). > > Hmm, etch is already released. You might be right that it's not done for > lenny yet. Though that's mainly because most of the architecture pages > are incomplete after many requests to complete them... Don't understand what you're trying to say here. My point is that apparently we _had_ buildd redundancy at some point, but have lost it for some reason. To me that indicates a problem for the project, especially when it turns out that the remaining buildds are incapable of keeping up by themselves. > I think you'd better look at db.debian.org/machines.cgi to have an idea > of the current status... I can see the current status fine on jvw's buildd pages: those three arches only have a single active buildd listed when they're supposed to have two. Also, "restricted" does not really tell me what the exact purpose of a machine is.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.