Re: package ownership in Debian (was: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?)
On 7/29/06, Loïc Minier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I agree, but we need to keep in mind that Ubuntu has less officially
> packages (the main section) and the others are in universe section,
> by volunteers like us, that work on (almost) whatever thing they think is
Actually, I would be fine with only supporting a smaller set officially
in Debian too. Of course, not all Debian Developers would agree with
me on this.
I think Ubuntu has also two upload keyrings, one for people approved to
upload to main (the officially supported set) and one for people
allowed to upload to universe (more or less the rest).
Good point, i agree with you, but there's no doubt that this is a
discussion for Etch+1. I don't remember the project discussing second
citizen class packages but just architectures until now. If we define
a sane criteria and the non released packages turn the life of our
release team and people work on transitions easier, why not? It's time
to consider if Etch will be bigger than needed and what can be better
for Etch+1, IMHO.