Re: New policy draft available at http://master.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/policy/
Ian Jackson wrote:
> I don't want to get into a detailed argument about the way the
> technical committee worked last time, but it doesn't seem to me that
> the process was broken, or that it took too long, or that it came up
> with a significantly wrong answer.
>
> Are you complaining that it took two or three weeks ?
No, he's presumably complaining that it took 1+ months. (From sometime in
late July to the 5th of September.)
> policy process takes that long too - for every decision, not just
> disputed ones - and in the case in point the policy manual itself had
> been broken for ages. You can hardly claim it was urgent.
For 2 months, due to the delays in both processes, nobody in Debian knew what
to do, and there was mass confusion and disagreement. I think this qualified
as urgent.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: