[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: AM Report for Week Ending 08 Dec 2002

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:51:19PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:17:09PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Or were you suggesting that Eray's application should simply be
> > rejected, and the file closed?

> Personally, I'd rather be rejected than having to wait another a year
> for an approval that might never come. At least a rejection would
> probably come with an explanation, and having one would finally give
> me a reason to move on (away from Debian in that case).

But your circumstances are not analogous to Eray's; your application has
no public DAM comments on it, so you're essentially in limbo.  In Eray's
case, OTOH, there is a clearly indicated course of action that he should
complete in order to become a DD.  If he has not received an outright
rejection, this is probably because he hasn't indicated to anyone in
charge that he's not willing to complete his application; in which case,
there's no reason to think he should be rejected.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgp4yvG43GnDJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: