[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: AM Report for Week Ending 08 Dec 2002

On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:17:09PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Or were you suggesting that Eray's application should simply be
> rejected, and the file closed?

Personally, I'd rather be rejected than having to wait another a year
for an approval that might never come. At least a rejection would
probably come with an explanation, and having one would finally give
me a reason to move on (away from Debian in that case).

Your sincerely,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

* Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau              Computer Science & Student Rep, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it                 Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
*     <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0>      <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>     *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *

Attachment: pgpDHPA7KCwYb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: