On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:21:24AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > (Removing CC to debian-mips, as your last mail got the point across). > > Well, that was on purpose... I know, and that was the right thing. > > > Enjoy 4.3 series... An IMHO interesting test would be trying to > > > get it built with 4.2. > > > > While I'd love to, "this is a job for Debian (mips) man!". What I > > mean is, someone has to do this on a machine and tell me if this is > > a regression (since doko has ruled out the possiblity of GCC 4.2 > > being the preferred build toolchain component, we have confirm that > > it's a regression). > > ... since I'd bet it's more likely to have a subscriber of -mips than a > subscriber of -mentors be able to do so, that's why I replied with a > cross-post. You might want to try $arch@buildd.debian.org, but looks > to me you might have more chance by asking the -mips subscribers. I am thankful to you for doing so, which is why I said "you got the point across" (to the right people). :-) Just to confirm, is it considered all right to mail debian-<port> for help on debugging architecture specific problems? I guess people who listen wouldn't mind helping out, would they? Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature