On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:23:39PM +0100, David Given wrote: > (Incidentally, the more I look at fakechroot the more I'm coming to believe > that it's no use for anything whatsoever. The security aspects of it are... > erm... nil; it's trivial for the client app to break out of its jail. Is this > a potential problem?) No, because it's not meant to provide security, just like fakeroot isn't meant to provide real root privs. - Matt