Hi Andreas, Le 24/07/2015 20:00, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Julien, > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:23:12PM +0200, Julien Lamy wrote: >>> Sounds like good progress. Just let us know about any problem. >> >> I added the documentation in a new package without too many >> difficulties. However, I wondered whether the documentation package >> should contain the library version or not (i.e. libdcmtkpp0-doc vs. >> libdcmtkpp-doc): unless I'm mistaken, both kinds of package exist. Is >> there any preference? > > I think it is a matter of taste. My taste would say to drop the version > number. I eventually decided to keep it: if the library version changes (and it most surely will), I think it might be a nice feature to have both documentation packages. I think I have now addressed the concerns raised in the ITP, and I have added a README.Debian containing the extra information from the ITP. It feels like the first version of the package is ready: is there anything else I should correct? What would be the next steps? Best regards, -- Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature