Re: Packaging InVesalius
Andreas,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:47:23AM -0200, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote:
>> > Please make very sure that the source also contains the *source* of this
>> > PDF file (whatever it might be).
>>
>> Yes. It contains the latex files used to build the pdf file.
>
> That's good to know.
>
>> > On the other hand: You also could put a symlink using a file
>> >
>> > debian/links
>> >
>> > and just symlink to the original location which might save you the patch.
>>
>> I chose this one. It's simpler :)
>
> Yes. That's why I was mentioning it.
>
>> > BTW, if the documentation is only in pt_BR I'd advise upstream to try to
>> > give at least an English translation.
>>
>> This is complicated. We are eager to release a new version very soon.
>> I don't know if we'll have time to translate to English before the
>> release.
>
> No problem with this. I just wanted to say that while documentation in
> /usr/share/doc/<pkgname> is a very important thing to have but from a
> general point of view if the documentation is not in English I would
> reduce the effort I'm investing into it (like patches etc.) Keeping
> things simple is in this case quite reasonable and once there might be a
> translation we might consider rethinking what should be done to serve
> our users best.
I've done and committed that trick with debian/links. I saw I'll need
create a man to InVesalius because the package adds a script file in
/usr/bin/. I think I'll work on it after the next invesalius release.
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20121212104655.GC30639@an3as.eu">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20121212104655.GC30639@an3as.eu
>
Thanks!
Reply to: