Re: [SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.5.0-rc1-9-gb88de18

[Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-03-22 07:36, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> writes:
> 
>> Over the weekend I deviced the attached patch; the only thing is that it
>> starts nagging users if they miss a versioned B-D for some dh_* command
>> they use.  This is great when they would also get the pedantic tag, but
>> I am not certain how great it is if they get the warning tag for missing
>> versions.
>>   Comments welcome.
> 
> Looks good to me.  I wouldn't worry about giving them two warnings, one
> for the missing dependency and another for a dependency required for a
> specific dh_* command.  I think that's only a minor change in behavior and
> they're both separate legitimate issues.
> 

Okay.

Btw, do we do a similar thing for the commands[1] (have warning and a
pedantic tag) or should I remove commands that are satisfied by compat 7?

~Niels

[1] debhelper-script-needs-versioned-build-depends
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=D12v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----