On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:47:52PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > * What's wrong with the GFDL and what problems can it cause Interesting link via google: The FOLDOC computing dictionary has been licenced to us under GFDL without invariant sections. We have incorporated many articles from them. Two weeks ago, somebody asked me whether the material from our TeX article (http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/TeX), which was originally based on FOLDOC's but has since grown considerably, could be reintegrated into FOLDOC. The answer is: only if they put our Wikipedia table into the FOLDOC entry, which they are unlikely to do because it doesn't really fit with their article formatting. -- http://www.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-June/002238.html Some back-story available in: -- http://www.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2001-October/000624.html Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature