Re: Apache clustering w/ load balancing and failover
> No, I don't think this would work. You'll need a third box which will do
> the balancing (well, maybe you could get it to work but it's not
> intended this way).
> As I said before, the balancer doesn't have to be a fast machine -
> almost anything you can find will be sufficient.
Strangely enough, you might find FreeBSD (or one of the BSDs) working
better as the forwarded than Linux, due to it's better ability to handle
many multiple concurrent connections. YMMV of course.