Linas Zvirblis wrote: > It is really just a matter of "do we want it?" and "what exactly do we > want?". For example, will GNOME/KDE guys be willing to drop current menu > and comply with Policy? And *this* will take time. No matter them being cooperative or not, that's actually not the problem. Anyway, as I'll certainly not be the one doing the work, I can only bring an advice here and I just want to warn against too wide goals which will make the change depend on so many different parts of Debian that a single person will never succeed doing it and it will take more than one release cycle to do it. Even the menu l10n cannot certainly be a release goal for Etch. But "we" (I'd better say "you", meaning Bill, you and other interested parties) can at least prepare a reasonable release goal for etch+1 which would include *at the minimum* the l10n of Debian menu entries... PS: we should take care of keeping Bill involved in this discussion.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature