Re: Packages needing to be tested
> Your List just checks for (i386 and not hurd-i386), but it
> doesn't mention for instance 'slocate' and 'jove' which were
> successfully compiled, but aren't (yet) available as
> hurd-i386-packages in the distribution...
> it would be nice if i could check for one of these packages, and
> can find out 'it works, but ...'
This is better done through the BTS.
> or other way round in your list appears 'modutils'... this could
> be flagged as 'not needed'.
> but i think thats a lot of work to implement.
This is admittedly a complete hack, however, a possibly useful one, if
some new packages appear and bugs get fixed. I do not plan to waste
much time with this.
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com