Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:20:09AM -0400, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 20.10.2016, 16:53 +0300 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis:
> > I think you are right. Joachim fixed a bug in haddock, where it would
> > not respect the `--mathjax` option, but we still have to pass the above
> > option to haddock when building *-doc packages.
>
> that seems right. I guess when I added the patch, I only worked on the
> ghc package, which does not use haskell-devscripts.
>
> Good job reverse-engineering my intentions!
Great. Are we also going to need to modify haskell-devscripts to undo
this PIE breakage, or is that going to be a ghc-only fix?
Reply to: