Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 07:47:46AM +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> 3) we need to patch ghc to work with llvm 3.8 and remove the armel stuff
Not sure why this is a blocker and I don't particularly like the
idea of losing git-annex on armel.
> I will need help because I know *nothing* about haskell :)
So I'm not sure what Joachim had intended. I thought it was
to modify haddock, but we could also modify haskell-devscripts
so that --mathjax=file:///usr/share/javascript/mathjax/MathJax.js
gets passed to everything.
Reply to: