Hi, Am Sonntag, den 05.07.2009, 13:33 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > For me, with a crappy Australian internet connection that is a huge > win, especially if we eventually get GHC (which is big) into the > same repo. just a quick side-note: I don’t think its desireable to have the ghc package itself maintained by the pkg-haskell group. I see the merits of the group maintenance in reducing the workload of maintaining lots of very similar, low-effort packages. GHC is the opposite of that: It’s large, it’s unique, it’s difficult, and thus it needs a proper maintainer. I see pkg-haskell not as a topic-based group, but a method-based group: We maintain everything that’s cabalized :-) (Again, this opinion is influenced by the Debian Perl Group experience :-). The DPG does not maintain perl, but only CPAN libraries, and that’s one key to success.) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil