On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:04:19PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, I am BTS cleaning mode :-) Thanks. Attached is a patch which should be uploaded. Osamu, Ardo? > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 11:45:47PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 10:44:31PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > Also last minutes check whether we can enable Korean PDF/PS? (Jens? > > > Any good idea?) > > > > Korean works nice (but not perfect since English strings such as > > "Chapter" are still used) using fixlatex from DDP. > > I see. This reminded me to check several bugs for debiandoc-sgml. Again: It works well on my Woody and Sarge box but www-masters version of apt-howto.ko.pdf has wrong fonts. Can someone check whether hlatex and hlatex-fonts-base are installed? If yes I assume Recommends: is incomplete (I added already gs and cjk-latex, ..., a few Chinese/Japanese fonts are still missing in Recommends since I had no time to check that all fonts used in debian-reference package are really necessary). > Considering this package to be last stage before deprecated, I think we > should not ask too much to the maintainer but some simple fix to support > existing documentation and their translation will be needed. > > I would say, unless someone decides to volunteer for significant time, > let's keep most of these wishlist items (except L10N) as almost "wontfix". OK. > Above changes for severity are the result of my review. > * 286537 Paper size > This needs to be fixed if report is true. So stays normal. Bug confirmed and fixed. > * L10N support data > GREEK 283260, ARABIC 286240 support info: request to ML with > instruction. > Slovenian 291481 is good. We need to prepare a patch (Expand > documentation for how to add new locales) Slovenian added (and bogus LaTeX code from patch fixed). > I call them L10N bugs. These should be minor considering there has been > practical needs to support them. Of course we need help so tags them as > HELP when ever there is no information provided. I will ping original > bug report separately to let them know the way to add language support. > > Thread of discussion and BTS report followings are good reference: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2005/01/msg00123.html > http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2005/01/msg00125.html > http://bugs.debian.org/291481 > > Jens's patch to German belongs to this category too. A really minor fix :-) > * 202315 CJK PDF/PS > Together with wishlist 229849, 244625 bugs with seemingly good fix > proposals, this bug needs to be fixed. Ask Jens to look into this with > current Korean fix issues. (See below) I consider them as normal bugs. Done. > * 214249 Style (TeX) > If this is a good patch, I can agree to keep it in minor. Fixed (80% of it was already fixed in the past). > * 188117, 213332, Style w/o patch > These are nonessential cosmetic requests without specific patch > attached. So moving them to "wishlist". > > * 285885 Type setting TeX > Although annoying as reported, changing TEX's behavior is nontrivial. > Since 238003 is wishlist, this should be equal severity. Modern UTF-8 > desktop complicates situation more too. > > * 218529 Error output style > Silly is worth only for wishlist. Maybe worth sending ping. These are not yet fixed. > * 202317 touch up script > This capability will greatly helps unifying support of many > documentation. Current patch is non-functional thus removed but this is > worth attacking, I think. Please think about it when you look script. Sorry, I didn't tried your patch but propose a new one which works. But I think your patch looks good as well! I also fixed partially #244625 by changing "\dots " to \dots{}" which adds a space after ... when necessary. The fonts related stuff is not applied since I never play with fonts, I use defaults especially in LaTeX. > ============================================================= > KOREAN ISSUE: > > Please note that there is currently already another Korean document in > > DDP: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/apt-howto.ko.pdf > > The file above looks ugly, don't know why. I was able to create this > > document on my Woody and Sarge system. Maybe the required packages > > hlatex and hlatex-fonts-base where installed on www-master after > > the build occurred and one needs just to touch the apt-howto.ko.sgml file > > to force a new rebuild? > > This seems to have encoding problem. NO, it works locally (using the fixlatex script from DDP). > > The current patch can be found as attachment. > > I will improve and finish it this week. Done. > Please. Can you check all TeX style related patch and propose good > patch. > > 229849 Not yet fixed. > 244625 (patch exist) Partially fixed. PS: I forgot to remove a few Todo items in source package. As soon as this package is uploaded it should be installed on www-master (libroman-perl and sgml-data from Sarge are required for this?). Jens
Attachment:
debiandoc-sgml-1.1.84.diff.gz
Description: Binary data