Re: debiandoc to docbook conversion situation full review (1st try)
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 06:27:37PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> philippe.batailler@free.fr (Philippe Batailler) writes:
>
> > For replacing numbered sections, element <section>, not <sect>.
> > But are we sure we don't want numbered sections?
>
> I think so, yes. But it's hard for me to say. AFAICT, neither is
> depracted and both are valid so I guess it's really just a question of
> what authors prefer. I think the, because, quoting
> <URL:http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/section.html>:
>
> Sections may be more convenient than numbered sections in some
> authoring environments because they can be moved around in the
> document hierarchy without renaming.
>
> I don't supposed it's possible to have a switch that will allow the
> author to choose?
You mean conversion table switchable XSLT. It is possible with a hack.
I used cpp so now parent of all XSLT can be one file for easy
maintenance. All I have to do is add another definition and #ifdef :)
I an now switching between book and article.
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
Reply to: