Re: debiandoc to docbook conversion situation full review (1st try)
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Philippe Batailler wrote:
> Adam DiCarlo <email@example.com> écrivait :
> « Can you regenerate the table and send it along?
I made a html page. I will post it to
It is group writable by any DD.
> I have made a new stylesheet with the following changes:
Great. I included your change into table with markings (pb)
> strong -> <emphasis role="bold">
This is <emphasis role="strong"> according to Adam (aph)
> ftpsite -> <systemitem class="systemname" role="ftpsite">
> ftppath -> <filename>
> For exemple, policy.sgml reads:
> The current version of this document is always accessible
> from the Debian FTP server <ftpsite>ftp.debian.org</ftpsite>
> Best practice : the two elements in one <ulink> element?
> httpsite -> <systemitem class="systemname" role="httpsite">
> httppath -> <filename>
I think these have to be converted to <url> in the debiandoc first and
use ulink to be consistent.
> comment/p -> <phrase>
> I put this element because element <remark> in xml does not
> contain <para>
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract