Re: Longer maintainance for (former) stable releases of Debian (Re: Dreamhost dumps Debian)
> Alternately, we could be far more aggressive about removing packages from
> oldstable, I suppose, but I don't think that's a good idea; that just
> leaves our users with exactly the sorts of choices that we're trying to
> avoid. I think it's much cleaner and better for our users to offer full
> security support and then retire the whole distribution at the same time.
> It makes planning considerably easier, among other things.
I don't really understand it myself as server packages and their
dependencies tend to be stable and I tend to want the latest versions of
dovecot, unbound etc..
However perhaps there is a divide here between servers which want longer
support for few packages and desktops which want stable but secure yet
as featureful as is sensible desktops.
'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work
together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a