Re: New virtual packages: lv2-plugin and lv2-host

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: New virtual packages: lv2-plugin and lv2-host"):
> It seems to me that you are applying more strict rules now than has been 
> applied to other names on the list in the past.

This is not some kind of hazing ritual where people have to persuade a
reluctant audience.  I'm just trying to make sure that we understand
what these virtual package names are for.  And past decisions are not
necessarily a good guide in a relatively lightweight process like this
one.

Do users specifically find LV2 plugin packages by name and install
them ?  How does it help the user to have an arbitrary "lv2-host"
installed too ?

Ian.