[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Buildd & binary-indep

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > But this whole discussion got boring something like 10 years ago. It's
> > a shame there is still no proper solution for that now.
> Yeah, the only one who submitted code has been Bill Allombert and he did
> it without following my recommendations so I have still not merged the
> required support...

Unless I missed it in a previous discussion, I can't see what's wrong
with simply mandating support with a new Standards-Version as
Bernhard suggested.  Could you elaborate on why Build-Features seems
preferable since this appears to be a simple and easily implementable
solution to the problem?


  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: