[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Buildd & binary-indep

On 2010-09-28, Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> wrote:
> The least contentious solution right now would be filing bugs, IMO. All
> that'd need is an autobuilder and a few volunteers to process the
> logs.

If there's a clean plan and working software we can run this on Debian
infrastructure.  We're working on providing (partial) archive rebuilds.
Currently two machines are dedicated for this and needed two weeks to rebuild
all packages for amd64 with a simple setup.  This will also be announced
as soon as we improved the setup a bit.

This case is a bit different than a simple "let's rebuild everything" or
even "let's rebuild everything with $dependency from experimental", which
we already support, because it changes the build target invocations.  We use
the same software as the normal autobuilders (i.e. sbuild git/branch buildd),
so that one shouldn't break.  But a patched dpkg-buildpackage might be
acceptable, too.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern

Reply to: