Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s (Re: Can we ship sources of a PDF file in the Debian diff?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:11:26PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The primary problem with setting Reply-To is that it makes private
> replies extremely difficult (in clients that honor the RFC-defined
> meaning of the header field, at least) and significantly increases the
> chances that private replies will accidentally become public. I don't
> think that's the right social direction in which to go.
If this is such a concern, I would like to see the Code of Conduct updates to
recommend that people concerned with follow up emails set the appropriate
headers in their own clients. This was detailed earlier in this thread.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
Reply to: