On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:12:43PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > In addition, I thought that the 'notest' build option that was discussed > > last year (or the year before?) on this list made it into the Policy, > > but I was wrong. > > nocheck will be in 3.8.1 (see Bug#416450), but it doesn't really address > your issue. Thanks for the pointer. > The upcoming wording doesn't add a way to distinguish between build > dependencies required for the build and ones required for testing. I think that was already clear to Charles. What I think he meant is that once 'notest' is widespread enough, its "natural evolution" would be a way to distinguish dependencies which belong to tests. Personally, I'd add as a condition for this to be a reasonable request, the fact that there should be enough packages with enough test-only dependencies, which I'm not convinced it is the case. If they are rare enough, debian/control.in + README.Debian-source is the way to go. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature