Re: xinetd is a viable inet-superserver
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:34:47PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> [0] the reasoning is: this is clear to me that through update-inetd
> that is the debian way to enable inet-like services, something
> that claims to be an inet-superserver must react on update-inetd
> triggered changes. update-inetd atm only acts on /etc/inetd.conf,
> so as a consequences I believe it's necessary for an
> inet-superserver provider to grok /etc/inetd.conf.
This is at odds with many years of discussion on this mailing list, where
the consensus was that xinetd should have its own update-inetd that supports
the xinetd config format natively.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Reply to: