Re: xinetd is a viable inet-superserver
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:51:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Well, not completely true. There might be more than one understanding.
> > Mine is that providing a inet-superserver provides the _functionality_
> > of a inet-superserver not the same _config file_.
> wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform
> what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading
> /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possibly have extended features on its own.
Where is that documented? Watching the progression of inetd packages in
Debian has been dizzying, I don't have the sense that there's any sort of
central plan that everyone's following. This virtual package's semantics
certainly aren't documented in policy.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/