Le dimanche 12 août 2007 à 09:34 +0000, William Pitcock a écrit : > It's not our fault that Debian packaged an old, buggy, and generally speaking, > broken version of Audacious with a bunch of backported patches that may or may > not be fully compatible. You should talk about this with the maintainer; this has nothing to do with our processes. If that version was so buggy as not to be usable, the maintainer should have prevented it from entering a stable release. > It's not our fault that Debian still has not promoted our current stable > offering to testing, which has many of these crash fix and design defect fix > things you may have heard about. 1.3.2 has been in testing for more than a month. > It's not our fault that Etch did not ship with 1.3. 1.3 had been out for a > considerable amount of time when Etch shipped. I wonder what kind of crack you are on. Your website shows the 1.3.0 release date as being 2 march 2007. This was only one month before the etch release, during the deep freeze phase. If you think one month is a considerable amount of time, you have no idea of what integrating a distribution means. > Please don't claim that the most > recent versions of audacious (as shipped and maintained by us) crashes every 2 > minutes because that's simply not true -- Debian Etch ships 1.2, and so does > Lenny at this time. Please check your facts. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=