[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug mass filling



On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:49:01 -0400, Hubert Chan <uhoreg@debian.org> said: 

> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:46:23 -0500, Manoj Srivastava
> <srivasta@debian.org> said: [...]

>>> and for policy:

>>> These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug severities
>>> serious (for must or required directive violations), minor, normal
>>> or important (for should or recommended directive violations) and
>>> wishlist (for optional items). [2] However, this is not a direct
>>> mapping, and the release managers determine which violations are
>>> considered release-critical.

>> where does release criticality jump in here from? Policy has no
>> mention of RC in this context, I see no reason to suddenly inject
>> one.

> Well, I did say that it was a very rough draft. ;)

> Second try:
>   "... However, this is not a direct mapping, and the release
>   managers determine the severity of each violation."

        Direct mapping of *WHAT*? are you falling into the assumption
 that serious == RC? Why?

        manoj
-- 
Hard work never killed anybody, but why take a chance? Charlie
McCarthy
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: