Re: lilypond and python
Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr> writes:
> I wrote "the default python version", and I maintain that my original
> fix would work with the new upstream release.
Your "original fix" would not succesfully apply as a patch to the new
upstream version. It's also, as it happens, the *wrong* way to make
the new upstream release compile with a non-default python version.
This irony is amazing.
> Basically, my remarks match those in the complete report of Pierre
> Habouzit in <[🔎] 200607271206.04579.madcoder@debian.org> which you didn't
> reply to except to claim that you were already knew about the guile
> issue (yet you failed to mention it!).
I said that I was ahead of him; I did not say that I was months ahead
of him. I said that by the time he posted that message, it was not
news to me.
Thomas
Reply to: