Il giorno lun, 09/01/2006 alle 15.09 -0800, Matt Zimmerman ha scritto: > The reality of the situation is much less controversial. If a Debian > maintainer finds it useful to manage their translations in Rosetta, then > they can do that today, as a matter of individual choice. If they or a > future maintainer of the same package prefers to manage the translations by > hand, they can do that, and never touch Rosetta. Launchpad is a collection > of tools intended to promote more efficient collaboration on the development > of free software, and if it is to succeed, it will be because individuals > choose to use it, not because any organization requires that they do so. What really I don't understand is how a proprietary tool can promote more efficient collaboration on the development of _free software_. Sounds like an ossimoron to me. federico -- Federico Di Gregorio http://people.initd.org/fog Debian GNU/Linux Developer fog@debian.org INIT.D Developer fog@initd.org We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil. -- D.E.Knuth
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata