Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork?
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:32:14AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> occasions that their patch policy is less than optimal. While some
> personally agree with me, it's their policy and unfortunately it won't
> change... however, maybe there's still hope, now that more people are
Has there been any explanation for the policy? I'm having a hard time
thinking of any sensible reasoning.
Obviously there's no problem with posting the patches on the web and
including a pointer to them, or doing that if the patch is particularly
enormous. It's just insisting on doing it all the time but regardless
of what usptream want that seems odd.
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."