Re: Frank Carmickle and Marco Paganini must die
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 02:00:30PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:16:31PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > [Against my better judgement, I'll respond...]
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:33:59AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > > You have said that there are reliable ways of distinguishing a
> > > > dynamic from a static address remotely. You have asserted that by
> > > > "dynamic" you mean to include at least all DHCP-assigned
> > > > addresses.
> > > >
> > > > Now, can you please tell me how a remote site is supposed to know
> > > > whether a given address was assigned by DHCP?
> > >
> > > No, I'm not going to tell you, Thomas. Live with it.
> >
> > Would you consider telling the list? Some of us might be interested.
>
> Like I said, it's offtopic. Feel free to contact me offlist about it if you
> really want to know.
This whole goddamn thread's gone rather offtopic, so why stop now?
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX
Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Get bitten!
Reply to: